This first week, the overarching topic is that convention
and rules are not the same. Different genres contain different conventions, but
not every convention needs to be followed in order for something to be
characterized under the branch of a certain genre. As someone who does not
listen to country music, I found it difficult at first to describe what makes a
country song a country song. I soon learned there were many, many, arguably
endless, conventions that can describe country music. In fact, not only does
something not need to follow all the
conventions to be considered part of the genre, it can even break a few
conventions. From Dirk’s reading about genres, I found it interesting when Dirk
mentioned that the creation of a new genre stems when someone bases his or her
response on a previous response. It was a new perspective that I had not
previously thought of before. Genres do not simply form out of thin air but
rather comes from repeating rhetorical situations, and as each audience’s
response to the genre changes, the conventions within the genres change as
well. The reading about first and second order thinking was also very
interesting, as I had not previously thought about the different types of
thinking. The most memorable idea that the author mentioned was that “thinking
carefully means trying to examine your thinking while using it too—trying to
think about thinking while also thinking about something else—which often leads
people to foolishness” (Elbow 56). The key word that caught my attention in
particular was “foolishness.” It made me reread the sentence a few times, and
perhaps after thinking too carefully and examining my thinking while still
thinking, I wondered if I had been led to foolishness…
No comments:
Post a Comment